It was considered possible that another earthquake of similar size would follow the June 17 mainshock. This was realized 80 hours later. But before that, i.e. 26 hours before the magnitude 6.6 earthquake of June 21, as special warning was issued by IMO to the state and the local civil defence services. In the warning it was stated that the most likely hazard area (Figure 6) of a probable impending earthquake would be as indicated in the figure, i.e. within 1 km of the NS fault line on which the earthquake occurred.
= |
The warning was based on evaluation by IMO seismologists of time and space distribution of microearthquake activity. It was also based on the understanding of the tectonics of the area and the knowledge of the historical seismicity described briefly earlier in this paper. Indications based on seismic history as well as on recent observations that large seismic events tend to migrate approximately with a velocity of 5 km/day were also taken into account. The actual velocity between the 2 epicenters was 4.9 km/day.