Next: Tasks 3 and 4:
Up: Subpart 4A: Geophysical loggings
Previous: Task 1: Logging activities
Start: July 1996 (month 5)
End: February 1998 (month 24)
(following each logging campaign)
Responsible partner: GFZ.DR.DBL
Repeated measurements in
Nefsholt showed good repeatability, especially of the sonic log. The
standard deviation is in average between 2.5% and 3.5% of the average
travel time measured.
A good interpretation can be made in depth intervals with high sonic amplitude.
In these intervals the standard deviation usually is lower than 2.5%. Depth
intervals where the amplitude of the registrated signal is very low show
significant variation in the (automatically) picked travel-times and thus
cannot be considered for an analysis of changes.
Small differences between repeated logs in the high amplitude intervals seem to
be caused by inaccurate depth matching due to slightly different curve shapes
(Figure 23).
Thus, no changes in the sonic velocity have been observed so
Figure 23:
Data example showing from left to right panel:
an average curve of sonic amplitude, a superposition of
the average compensated travel times measured in October
1996 and in December 1997 (each averaged over four runs
performed immediately one after the other), the
difference between these two average travel time curves
(absolute value, green curve) and the standard deviation (absolute value) derived from the four runs performed in December 1997. Compensated travel times are given in
microseconds per foot. The difference between the
average travel times exceeds the standard deviation only
in low amplitude intervals (not shown here) or at depths with inaccurate depth-matching (for example around
740 m).
|
far. The same is true for the resistivity measurements, as can be seen from
Figure 24.
Figure 24:
Data example showing from left to right panel: gamma-ray
log in API, compensated travel time in microseconds per
foot and the sonic amplitude, and three repeated
measurements of latero log (LL3), medium induction log
(ILM) and deep induction log (ILD). Month an year of
campaign are given.
|
On the other hand, no relevant seismic activity has been observed in the
surrounding of this borehole since the beginning of the measurements.
We are thankful that Orkustofnun provided a lithology log of the well at
Nefsholt. This log shows a nearly continuous sequence of altered basalt,
interrupted only by a few thin sedimentary layers and some thin layers of
dolorite, hyaloclastites and fresh basalt. Corresponding to a porosity change
within each basaltic layer, the sections of altered basalt show very different
characteristics in sonic velocity and resistivity as well as in the neutron log.
These differences allow to distinguish between the lava-flows
(Figure 25).
Figure 25:
Data example showing the correlation between the
performed logs and the lithology log provided by
Orkustofnun. GR = gamma-ray in API, DT = compensated
travel time in microseconds per foot, neutron = neutron
log in API, ILD and ILM = induction log deep and medium
in Ohmm, LL3 = laterolog in Ohmm.
|
Next: Tasks 3 and 4:
Up: Subpart 4A: Geophysical loggings
Previous: Task 1: Logging activities
Gunnar Gudmundsson
1999-03-17